Приказ основних података о документу
Comparison of different side-dressings on winter wheat yield
Usporedba prihrane različitim načinima na urod ozime pšenice
dc.creator | Stipešević, Bojan | |
dc.creator | Stošić, Miro | |
dc.creator | Teodorović, Bojana | |
dc.creator | Jug, Irena | |
dc.creator | Jug, Danijel | |
dc.creator | Šimon, Miško | |
dc.creator | Bede, Zvonimir | |
dc.creator | Simić, Milena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-16T12:10:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-16T12:10:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1450-8109 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rik.mrizp.rs/handle/123456789/280 | |
dc.description.abstract | The trial with different side-dressing fertilizations for winter wheat has been conducted at Vetovo site, Croatia, in vegetation seasons 2007/08 and 2008/09. The five side-dressing fertilizations has been tested (Control - no sidedressing, KAN - 100 kg KAN ha-1 in tillering and jointing stages; M1 - 8 l of foliar NPK fertilizer 'Profert Mara' ha-1; M2 - 16 l ha-1 of foliar fertilizer, and; M3 - 24 ha-1 of foliar fertilizer) at four winter wheat cultivars (Anika, Fiesta, Gabi and Rapsodija), with previously applied 400 kg NPK 7:20:30 ha-1 for all treatments. Results showed that all foliar side-dressing treatments gave winter wheat grain yield higher than the control, and that M1 treatment showed equal in comparison with KAN side-dressing. Treatments M2 and M3 had, in comparison with the control, KAN and M1 treatments, higher yields which leads toward conclusion that foliar treatments can be recommended for side-dressing for given agroecological conditions. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Istraživanje sa različitim načinima prihrane ozime pšenice sproveden je u vegetacijskim sezonama 2007/08. i 2008/09. na lokalitetu Vetovo, Hrvatska. Testirano je pet tretmana prihrane (Kontrola - bez prihrane; KAN - po 100 kg KAN ha-1 u busanju i vlatanju; M1 - 8 l folijarnog NPK gnojiva 'Profert Mara' ha-1; M2 - 16 l ha-1 folijarnog gnojiva. te; M3 - 24 ha-1 folijarnog gnojiva) na četiri sorte ozime pšenice (Anika, Fiesta, Gabi i Rapsodija) uz prethodnu osnovnu gnojidbu za sve varijante od 400 kg NPK 7:20:30 ha-1. Pokus je pokazao da su svi tretmani folijarne prihrane dali urod viši od kontrolnog tretmana, te da se tretman M1 pokazao ravnopravnim u odnosu na prihranu KAN-om. Tretmanom M2 i M3, u odnosu na tretmane Kontrola, KAN i M1, signifikantno su povećani prinosi ozime pšenice, iz čega proizlazi da se folijarni tretmani mogu preporučiti u danim agroekološkim uslovima. | sr |
dc.publisher | Univerzitet u Beogradu - Poljoprivredni fakultet, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Journal of Agricultural Sciences | |
dc.subject | winter wheat | en |
dc.subject | foliar fertilizer | en |
dc.subject | yield | en |
dc.subject | hectoliter mass | en |
dc.subject | 1000-seed weight (TSW) | en |
dc.title | Comparison of different side-dressings on winter wheat yield | en |
dc.title | Usporedba prihrane različitim načinima na urod ozime pšenice | sr |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.volume | 54 | |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
dc.citation.spage | 189 | |
dc.citation.epage | 196 | |
dc.citation.other | 54(3): 189-196 | |
dc.citation.rank | M51 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2298/JAS0903189S | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://rik.mrizp.rs//bitstream/id/2209/278.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |