Приказ основних података о документу

Usporedba prihrane različitim načinima na urod ozime pšenice

dc.creatorStipešević, Bojan
dc.creatorStošić, Miro
dc.creatorTeodorović, Bojana
dc.creatorJug, Irena
dc.creatorJug, Danijel
dc.creatorŠimon, Miško
dc.creatorBede, Zvonimir
dc.creatorSimić, Milena
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T12:10:38Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T12:10:38Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1450-8109
dc.identifier.urihttp://rik.mrizp.rs/handle/123456789/280
dc.description.abstractThe trial with different side-dressing fertilizations for winter wheat has been conducted at Vetovo site, Croatia, in vegetation seasons 2007/08 and 2008/09. The five side-dressing fertilizations has been tested (Control - no sidedressing, KAN - 100 kg KAN ha-1 in tillering and jointing stages; M1 - 8 l of foliar NPK fertilizer 'Profert Mara' ha-1; M2 - 16 l ha-1 of foliar fertilizer, and; M3 - 24 ha-1 of foliar fertilizer) at four winter wheat cultivars (Anika, Fiesta, Gabi and Rapsodija), with previously applied 400 kg NPK 7:20:30 ha-1 for all treatments. Results showed that all foliar side-dressing treatments gave winter wheat grain yield higher than the control, and that M1 treatment showed equal in comparison with KAN side-dressing. Treatments M2 and M3 had, in comparison with the control, KAN and M1 treatments, higher yields which leads toward conclusion that foliar treatments can be recommended for side-dressing for given agroecological conditions.en
dc.description.abstractIstraživanje sa različitim načinima prihrane ozime pšenice sproveden je u vegetacijskim sezonama 2007/08. i 2008/09. na lokalitetu Vetovo, Hrvatska. Testirano je pet tretmana prihrane (Kontrola - bez prihrane; KAN - po 100 kg KAN ha-1 u busanju i vlatanju; M1 - 8 l folijarnog NPK gnojiva 'Profert Mara' ha-1; M2 - 16 l ha-1 folijarnog gnojiva. te; M3 - 24 ha-1 folijarnog gnojiva) na četiri sorte ozime pšenice (Anika, Fiesta, Gabi i Rapsodija) uz prethodnu osnovnu gnojidbu za sve varijante od 400 kg NPK 7:20:30 ha-1. Pokus je pokazao da su svi tretmani folijarne prihrane dali urod viši od kontrolnog tretmana, te da se tretman M1 pokazao ravnopravnim u odnosu na prihranu KAN-om. Tretmanom M2 i M3, u odnosu na tretmane Kontrola, KAN i M1, signifikantno su povećani prinosi ozime pšenice, iz čega proizlazi da se folijarni tretmani mogu preporučiti u danim agroekološkim uslovima.sr
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Poljoprivredni fakultet, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Agricultural Sciences
dc.subjectwinter wheaten
dc.subjectfoliar fertilizeren
dc.subjectyielden
dc.subjecthectoliter massen
dc.subject1000-seed weight (TSW)en
dc.titleComparison of different side-dressings on winter wheat yielden
dc.titleUsporedba prihrane različitim načinima na urod ozime pšenicesr
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.volume54
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage189
dc.citation.epage196
dc.citation.other54(3): 189-196
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/JAS0903189S
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rik.mrizp.rs//bitstream/id/2209/278.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу